<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Key Tech Blog &#187; tool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/tag/tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog</link>
	<description>Key Tech&#039;s take on Engineering, the World, and everything else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:55:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>3D Printing Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2011/3d-printing-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2011/3d-printing-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Schneider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/?p=860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are three major rapid prototyping techniques for making plastic parts fast; layer building, low-pressure molding/casting, and machining. Each has its advantages and drawbacks, depending on how you intend to use the part. Let's start with the various layer-building processes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are three major rapid prototyping techniques for making plastic parts fast; layer building, low-pressure molding/casting, and machining. Each has its advantages and drawbacks, depending on how you intend to use the part. Let&#8217;s start with the various layer-building processes.</p>
<p>Layer built processes create a single part by building up  a series of 2D cross-sections. Different methods require different layer heights and have different means of supporting the layers that are hollow underneath. Of course, one advantage of this process is that parts can be made that could never be fabricated by traditional production methods, such as hollow spheres or even an assembly of multiple integrated parts in a single build that come out of the machine assembled (such as the links of a chain).</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="163" valign="top">Type</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">
<p style="text-align: center;">Layer Thickness</p>
</td>
<td width="164" valign="top">
<p style="text-align: center;">Pros</p>
</td>
<td width="158" valign="top">
<p style="text-align: center;">Cons</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163" valign="top">SLA &#8211; UV laser and resin</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">0.001 &#8211;   0.006&#8243;</td>
<td width="164" valign="top">High   resolution, optically clear parts, easy to finish</td>
<td width="158" valign="top">Can be   brittle</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163" valign="top">SLS &#8211;   Laser and powder</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">0.004 &#8211; 0.006&#8243;</td>
<td width="164" valign="top">Strong parts, real materials(nylon,   Al)</td>
<td width="158" valign="top">Rough surface finish</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163" valign="top">FDM &#8211; hot glue gun</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">0.005 &#8211;   0.010&#8243;</td>
<td width="164" valign="top">Strong   parts, real materials (ABS, PC)</td>
<td width="158" valign="top">Resolution   is only okay, difficult to finish</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163" valign="top">Polyjet   &#8211; 3D inkjet printer</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">0.0006 &#8211; 0.001&#8243;</td>
<td width="164" valign="top">Very high resolution, fastest   process, flexible parts</td>
<td width="158" valign="top">most brittle/poorest material   properties, limited part size</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>SLA (Stereolithography) &#8211; </strong>Liquid photopolymer (resin) is cured with a laser in layers. After each layer is laid down, the platform lowers further into the resin by the layer thickness, and the laser cures the next layer of material. The part is then post cured with UV light.<strong> </strong>SLA was one of the first additive rapid prototyping technologies and is still the gold standard.  It is good for general pupose form and fit protoypes and when parts require high resolution, smooth surface finish, or optical clarity.</p>
<div id="attachment_861" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 464px"><img class="size-full wp-image-861" title="A part manufactured by SLA" src="http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Manf_SLA.jpg" alt="" width="454" height="303" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A part manufactured by SLA (Photo Credit: Key Tech)</p></div>
<p><strong>SLS (Selective Laser Sintering) –</strong> SLS builds layers similar to SLA, except instead of using UV light and a liquid photopolymer, a powdered material (real plastic or metal) is heated and fused together by a laser as a series of 2D cross-sections. SLS is a good choice for functional testing with real materials when smooth surface finish and fine resolution are not required.</p>
<div id="attachment_863" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 444px"><img class="size-full wp-image-863" title="A part manufactured through SLS" src="http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Manf_SLS.jpg" alt="" width="434" height="325" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A part manufactured through SLS (Photo Credit: Key Tech)</p></div>
<p><strong>FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) &#8211; </strong>Similar to a precision hot glue gun, long strands of real plastic material (ABS, PC, and others) are fed into the nozzle, melted, and deposited in a series of 2D cross-section layers. FDM layers are generally the thickest of the various processes, which limits feature size, but it usually provides better strength and robustness in comparison. FDM is good for prototyping functional parts without small features where surface finish is not important.</p>
<div id="attachment_862" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 332px"><img class="size-full wp-image-862" title="A part manufactured through FDM" src="http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Manf_FDM.jpg" alt="" width="322" height="242" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A part manufactured through FDM (Photo Credit: Key Tech)</p></div>
<p><strong>Polyjet &#8211; </strong>Using inkjet printing technologies, UV-curable materials are effectively &#8220;printed&#8221; on top of the previous layer to create a 3-dimensional part. Polyjet can produce high resolution parts with decent surface finish, is generally cheaper and faster than most other processes, and is one of the only additive prototyping processes that can produce flexible parts.  It is a good process for small parts requiring good resolution and a decent surface finish, or when flexible parts need to be prototyped.</p>
<div id="attachment_864" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 335px"><img class="size-full wp-image-864" title="A part manufactured through Polyjet" src="http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Manf_Polyjet.jpg" alt="" width="325" height="244" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A part manufactured through Polyjet (Photo Credit: Key Tech)</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2011/3d-printing-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Tech presents at the Johns Hopkins Medical Device Startup Tool Box Day</title>
		<link>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/johns-hopkins-medical-device/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/johns-hopkins-medical-device/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/?p=815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to start-up a medical device company?  Key Tech attended the Johns Hopkins University’s “Medical Device Start Up Tool Box Day” to explain why having an experienced design engineering partner in your “tool box” is key to your success.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you have a great idea for a novel medical device, and you’re looking to build a start-up company around it&#8230;Congrats!  But before you jump in, an honest look in the mirror should reveal that your “tool box” of skills may be fairly empty.  What tools do you need?  The “<a href="http://startupbaltimore.org/events/launching-a-medical-device-startup-check-out-medical-device-startup-tool-box-day/" target="_blank">Medical Device Startup Tool Box Day</a>” at Johns Hopkins recently brought together a mix of engineers, bankers, government agencies and tech incubators to try and answer that question.</p>
<p>Design engineering is a “tool” every medical device venture should take seriously.  Before searching for funding or lining up office space, your design must be thoroughly evaluated in its intended use.  Key Tech is the perfect partner for this, having spent the last 13+ years developing medical products.</p>
<p>Brian Lipford, VP of Strategic Development at Key Technologies kicked off the Tool Box Day by presenting an introduction to Key Tech.  His presentation is below:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="450" height="283" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qwPwn1t2-V8?rel=0&amp;hd=1" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p>After the presentations, we met with medical students, residents, researchers and some early-stage start ups.  Our advice to each of these entrepreneurs was the same:  Prior to engaging with Key Tech, you need to do your homework!</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>IP</strong> &#8211; Take a look at the patent landscape      to see if your idea is unique.  At      the very least, spend some time on Google poking around; it could save a      lot of time and heartache.  It’s no      surprise that without solid IP coverage, the deck is stacked against you.</li>
<li><strong>Risks</strong> &#8211; What are the technical risks associated      with your product?  What are the risks      to the patient?  Medical device      development is a risk-based business, so be comfortable with discussing this.</li>
<li><strong>Funding </strong>- How will you obtain funding?  Key Tech may be interested in a joint      venture arrangement with the right companies who are well funded.  If your idea has enough merit, Key Tech      may be open to pursuing an SBIR grant.</li>
<li><strong>Regulatory </strong>- What is your FDA regulatory      strategy?  Does your technology fall      into the streamlined 510k process, or is it going to be a more lengthy PMA      application?  What are your      potential reimbursement codes, because without them, you have no market!</li>
<li><strong>Competition </strong>- Scope out your competitors.  Is it possible that they could be      developing similar technology to yours?       Are you willing to compete with them?</li>
</ol>
<p>Key Tech enjoys attending events like these because it gives us a chance to interact with researchers and professionals on the front lines of medicine.  Without their expertise, we are often times left doing needs assessments in a box, which isn’t very effective.  We love solving problems, but it takes partnerships with the right people to identify those problems.</p>
<p>Aris Melissaratos, Senior Advisor to the President of Johns Hopkins, spoke at the event about the $1.4 billion research budget at Hopkins.  He mentioned they are looking to improve their “return on investment” by spinning out more companies and ideas from the university stemming from their research.  We see this as a perfect opportunity for Johns Hopkins to reach out to the business community, and for the community to do the same to bring product innovation up to par with research at the university.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/johns-hopkins-medical-device/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resources for tinkerers</title>
		<link>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/resources-for-tinkerers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/resources-for-tinkerers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Schneider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem Solving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/?p=643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you a tinkerer? For those of us that are concerned about how best to crack open a $1,000 MacBook with a critical soda problem yet have the compelling desire to take it apart anyway, there is help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My kids like to take things apart. Maybe it&#8217;s an innate human characteristic or just curiosity about the world around them. My five-year-old methodically removed all of the screws from his wooden mini-workbench and put them in a nice pile. My two-year-old&#8217;s technique comes closer to channeling Godzilla.</p>
<p>Are you a tinkerer? Even among engineers, I find that very few of us are willing to delve into the guts of a device with complexity outside our comfort range. I think kids have the advantage of not fearing whether they will be able to fix it later. They don&#8217;t think about how much it cost or whether it <em>should</em> be taken apart, and they&#8217;re confident an adult can provide a safety net. But, for those of us that <em>are</em> concerned about how best to crack open a $1,000 MacBook with a critical soda problem yet have the compelling desire to take it apart anyway, there is help.</p>
<p>Online video isn&#8217;t just for watching other people&#8217;s attempts at stardom. There are a host of instructional videos put together by generous people willing to share, learn from their mistakes, or just help you recover from what could be a $1,000 mistake. A quick search of YouTube or iFixIt can provide step-by-step examples of how to <a href="http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Device/MacBook_Core_2_Duo">take apart a MacBook</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYeQgS9_sAU">replace a cell-phone screen</a>, or <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpuQDTuT0ns">repair a chainsaw carburetor</a>.</p>
<p>As a tinkerer, perhaps you want to just build something yourself instead of buying it from a store. You can learn how to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWQhlmJTMzw">build a great HDTV Antenna</a> from coat hangers or an automated <a href="http://mt.makezine.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?blog_id=1&amp;Template=tag_display&amp;tag=@arduinonerf">Nerf Sentry Gun</a> to protect the office.</p>
<p>Enjoy! (and let me know how you made out)</p>
<p>Disclaimer: Umm, it&#8217;s the internet, so you can&#8217;t always believe what you see, even in a video. Use your head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/resources-for-tinkerers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collecting very fine volumetric accuracy data</title>
		<link>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/collecting-very-fine-volumetric-accuracy-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/collecting-very-fine-volumetric-accuracy-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Schneider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microfluidics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem Solving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[component selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obstacles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/?p=637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of the V&#038;V test procedure, we designed a gravimetric means to characterize the volumetric and flow-rate accuracy of a couple of precision injection instruments. With this setup, we're able to achieve measurement resolution of just 0.1 milligram and reduced the error due to water evaporation to 40 times better than using a mineral oil emulsion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of the V&amp;V (validation and verification) test procedure we developed a while ago, we designed a gravimetric means to characterize the volumetric and flow-rate accuracy of a couple of precision injection instruments (which I thought I’d share with you today). With this setup, some programming, and a fairly precise scale, we can automatically collect data during an injection to determine if the device meets the accuracy tolerances from the specification. We&#8217;re able to achieve measurement resolution of just 0.1 milligram and reduced the error due to water evaporation to 40 times better than using a mineral oil emulsion.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Gravimetric.jpg" rel="lightbox[637]"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-638" title="Gravimetric" src="http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Gravimetric-185x300.jpg" alt="" width="185" height="300" /></a>The Scale</strong></p>
<p>We chose an Acculab 210.4 scale because it was accurate enough (.0001 gram resolution, which is about a tenth of a microliter for room temperature water) and because it has a serial interface that we can call from Visual Basic to easily collect data and put into a spreadsheet. The data stream is limited to about 8Hz, but it was fast enough for our purposes.</p>
<p>Scales with more resolution often come with damping mechanisms to keep them stable. Although the glass cover keeps the air movement down, this one didn’t have a means to damp vibrations, so we needed to isolate the scale ourselves. We used a small table with some rubber feet as the foundation. Then we used one of those heavy engineering textbooks we have so many of on some thick foam and put the scale on top. Considerate use of flexible beams, soft materials, and masses meant the scale was rock-steady without any software averaging required.</p>
<p><strong>The Fluid Connection</strong></p>
<p>To get the fluid onto the scale, we attached tubing with a luer-lock fitting to a long needle inserted into the scale cover through a hole in the top plate and held in place with a thumb-screw. By using a needle instead of just inserting the tubing into the container, we eliminated any contact with the container or scale. we found that any such contact threw the scale out of whack, especially when the fluid flowed through the tubing with momentum.</p>
<p>The question came up as to whether the needle should be above the water-level or below it. If the needle is below the water-level, surface tension on the needle can reduce the weight of the water. However, if the needle is above the water-level, a drop can form at the tip instead of depositing the small volume onto the scale. We needed fine-resolution flow-rate data, so we opted to ignore the surface tension, which we found to be below the resolution of the scale.</p>
<p><strong>Evaporation of the Water</strong></p>
<p>Over the duration of a test, water will evaporate. The rate is dependent upon temperature, relative humidity, and the surface area of the container. Many suggest adding mineral oil to the water to create a barrier layer to supposedly eliminate evaporation of the water. Data showed that the oil layer did reduce the rate of evaporation (from 0.13 g/hr to 0.08 g/hr), although the oil ruined the plastic connections of the tubing by making them brittle and causing them to leak and break. Instead, we drilled a 1/4” hole into the cap of the container for the needle to fit through, which dropped the rate of evaporation by two orders of magnitude. We collected data for various configurations of the water, oil, and lid and plotted them below. So, without using any oil, we were able to drop the rate of evaporation from 0.127 g/hr to 0.002 g/hr.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Evaporation_of_Water.jpg" rel="lightbox[637]"><img class="size-medium wp-image-639 aligncenter" title="Evaporation of Water from a Jar" src="http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Evaporation_of_Water-300x230.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="230" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Volume and Flow Rate</strong></p>
<p>So, how does a measure of weight relate to volume and flow-rate? Well, the density of water is pretty well defined based on temperature (and weight / density = volume). Accounting for the error of this density value, as well as errors in the scale resolution and time resolution provided excellent measurement results by which to evaluate the devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/collecting-very-fine-volumetric-accuracy-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do I really need to know this?</title>
		<link>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/do-i-really-need-to-know-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/do-i-really-need-to-know-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Schneider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/?p=623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those "core" classes in college may seem superfluous when trying to tackle an engineering curriculum, but I'm grateful that I was exposed to topics like business, philosophy, and psychology. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was once talking with a group of engineering students about what it’s like as an engineer. One student asked if I’d ever needed this or that “core” class from college (I believe it was macroeconomics). The short answer to his question was, “I may not refer to classes on business, philosophy, or psychology regularly, but I’m grateful I was exposed to them.” Although there are plenty of times I wish I could remember everything I’ve  ever learned, I can’t recall any time I’ve regretted my time spent learning.</p>
<p>It’s true that engineers have a particularly packed class-schedule, thus squeezing in classes outside their major seems superfluous. My undergraduate engineering program at UMCP required about 15 more credits than other curricula, so I, like other engineers, spent many evenings stressing over classes that I didn’t think were needed for my future in engineering.</p>
<p>It’s likely this student couldn’t relate macroeconomics to his own life (this was Summer 2008). However, since then, we’ve watched the failures of a few huge businesses send economic waves throughout the world. Companies, cities, states, and countries have gone bankrupt. Inflation and deflation are both serious worries. It’s a good time to understand a little about macroeconomics.</p>
<p>Engineers are notorious for falling somewhere between “a little nerdy” and “socially awkward”. A look around Key Tech does nothing to dispel that stereotype. But, it’s a fun crowd with interests in theoretical physics (admittedly, still nerdy), business, photography, nature, travel, cooking, brewing, farming, athletics, web development, and more. These interests developed when we were exposed to something  beyond the world of engineering.</p>
<p>Something that starts out as a chore might turn into a hobby or even shape a career path. It’s too early to discount the impact of a well rounded education on the rest of your life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/do-i-really-need-to-know-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are your mechanical and electrical rapid prototyping capabilities?</title>
		<link>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/rapid-prototyping-capabilities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/rapid-prototyping-capabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Schneider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Key Tech accomplishes prototyping by leveraging a network of approximately three dozen prototyping vendors, selecting the method and vendor based on the best match to your application. Multiple suppliers keep us current with the state of the art technologies and allow for flexibility and speed in the prototyping process. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Key Tech accomplishes prototyping by leveraging a network of approximately three dozen prototyping vendors, selecting the method and vendor based on the best match to your application. Multiple suppliers keep us current with the state of the art technologies and allow for flexibility and speed in the prototyping process. </p>
<p>Key Tech outsources for prototype components and then assembles, details, and tests in-house. Prototyping capabilities are full service, including SLA, SLS, thermoforming, urethane, epoxy and silicone casting, polyjet, CNC machined parts, full electrical prototyping including microprocessor selection (in-house), board design (in-house), population and testing, user interface screen mock-ups with display software, and more.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/rapid-prototyping-capabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The symbiosis of modeling and prototyping</title>
		<link>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/the-symbiosis-of-modeling-and-prototyping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/the-symbiosis-of-modeling-and-prototyping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Schneider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lab-on-a-chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microfluidics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem Solving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obstacles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keytechinc.com.php5-6.dfw1-2.websitetestlink.com/blog/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prototypes are essential to testing system performance. However, due to the current technological constraints of creating microscale prototypes, compromises in the characteristics of the prototype usually must be made, which can lead to unforeseen, expensive problems on the production line. Fortunately, basic, fundamental models of significant aspects of the system (first-principles modeling) can be “calibrated” through the use of focused CFD models and empirical data. The result is improved models that allow the designer to bridge the knowledge gap between paper and production.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prototypes are essential to testing system performance. However, due to the current technological constraints of creating microscale prototypes, compromises in the characteristics of the prototype usually must be made, which can lead to unforeseen, expensive problems on the production line. Fortunately, basic, fundamental models of significant aspects of the system (first-principles modeling) can be “calibrated” through the use of focused CFD models and empirical data. The result is improved models that allow the designer to bridge the knowledge gap between paper and production.</p>
<p>Read more about the <a href="http://www.micromanufacturing.com/past_editions/pdf/Jan-Feb2010.pdf" target="_blank">symbiosis of modeling and prototyping</a> (PDF) for designing microscale parts in an article I wrote that was published in MICROmanufacturing Magazine this month, page 33 (Jan/Feb 2010, Volume 3, Issue 1).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/the-symbiosis-of-modeling-and-prototyping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Born with questions</title>
		<link>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/born-with-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/born-with-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Schneider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem Solving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is asking the right questions something that can be taught, or do you have to be born with this twisted skill?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-508" title="Asking The Right Questions" src="http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Questions.jpg" alt="Asking The Right Questions" width="138" height="204" />Designing a product requires thinking about all of the various problems that could arise and heading them off.</p>
<ul>
<li>How can this be cleaned?</li>
<li>Is it going to be dropped?</li>
<li>What if someone sticks a finger in here?</li>
</ul>
<p>As an engineer, it’s a good skill to have. But, is <em>asking the right questions</em> something that can be taught, or do you have to be born with this twisted skill?</p>
<p>If you’ve spent any time around young kids, you know that asking questions comes naturally. At that stage, “Why?” is one of the most common words in our vocabulary. We’re born with so many questions, and every answer simply creates more questions.</p>
<p>At some point, though, we have to refine this line of questioning, if only to get to sleep. Experience and intuition can help determine which answers are productive and which are just interesting. Draw the line. Give users some amount of responsibility, some amount of credit to their intelligence, and create some limit to the amount of abuse a product can take. Otherwise, the next handheld medical device will have a steel shell, cost ten times as much as it should, and take twice as long to get out the door.</p>
<p>Photo credit: <em><a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/960692" target="_blank">arte_ram</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2010/born-with-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is ISO-certification good for a design firm?</title>
		<link>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2009/why-is-iso-certification-good-for-a-design-firm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2009/why-is-iso-certification-good-for-a-design-firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Lipford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/?p=480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without robust design processes, it is all too easy to lose track of critical design issues - the consequence of which is usually schedule delays, added costs, and/or undesirable design compromises.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have long understood that to be one of the most successful companies for developing challenging, technology-based products (especially in the medical industry), we had to create and implement well defined design processes and efficient design strategies.  Without robust design processes, it is all too easy to lose track of critical design issues &#8211; the consequence of which is usually schedule delays, added costs, and/or undesirable design compromises.</p>
<p>Therefore, following extensive research and planning, we decided to utilize ISO standards, which are recognized worldwide, as the basis for defining our design processes. With a sturdy foundation, we were able to then tailor the system to our needs as a design firm, adding the necessary design strategies that would enable us to confidently provide our clients with the highest quality and most cost effective solution to their product development needs.</p>
<p>Since 2003, we’ve had a certified quality assurance program that not only satisfies the requirements of ISO 9001 and ISO 13485 but also enables us to efficiently design technically challenging products in accordance with many of today’s stringent design and regulatory requirements.  In other words, our quality assurance program, combined with our design and development procedures, enable us to quickly and cost effectively develop everything from simple mechanical parts to complex, automated, medical devices that require extensive regulatory compliance.  In addition, at the end of a project, we will have confidence that:</p>
<ul>
<li>we haven’t overlooked a critical design issue</li>
<li>the product will be safe and effective for the intended use, and</li>
<li>all the documentation necessary to verify and validate the effectiveness of the product design will be available to satisfy regulatory requirements or to transfer to our client for their documentation needs.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2009/why-is-iso-certification-good-for-a-design-firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Starting Your Product Specification</title>
		<link>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2009/starting-your-product-specification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2009/starting-your-product-specification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Schneider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[component selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Creating a detailed Product Specification is one of the most important steps one can take at the beginning of new product development. If the spec defines the entire sphere of possibilities, what needs to be included (and excluded) here?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-475" title="Confused by where to start your product specification?" src="http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/questions.jpg" alt="Confused by where to start your product specification?" width="210" height="158" />Creating a detailed Product Specification is one of the most important steps one can take at the beginning of new product development. Previously, I wrote a post with some tips on <a href="../index.php/2009/detailed-product-specification/" target="_blank">how to craft entries in a product specification</a>, but you might still be stuck at the starting line. If the spec defines the entire sphere of possibilities, what needs to be included (and excluded) here?</p>
<p>Most of the specific values of the product specification will come from external sources, as opposed to technical constraints. The spec will include the needs of the end-user, but any design is likely to also involve input from those people between the engineers and the end-users &#8211; a contract client, the marketing department, or internal management. In product development, there are very real market pressures to consider regarding sales, user needs, competitors, price, and more that will influence the overall design.</p>
<p>Specifications will vary from product to product, but there are certainly some aspects that are likely to show up everywhere.</p>
<p><strong><em>Performance</em></strong></p>
<p>Of course, most devices have to meet performance criteria as a major consideration of their success. This includes factors like accuracy, reliability, appropriate measurement or operating ranges, data logging capacity, or data transmission characteristics. These factors may be defined as minimum and maximum limits, to be determined later based on cost, technology, and other features. Try not to limit the possibilities yet, leaving room for compromises later.</p>
<p><strong><em>Construction</em></strong></p>
<p>Even if the materials haven’t been defined because of performance features still waiting to be designed, there are details that can be defined early on. We might define the parameters of a Drop Test, a maximum device weight, or other factors that will influence our choices of materials and assembly. Will the inside of the device need to be accessible for cleaning or service? How will the device be used?</p>
<p><strong><em>Environmental</em></strong></p>
<p>When products work fine in the lab and crash in real life, there may have been factors that were overlooked. Long-term problems like corrosion, moisture, dust, and UV damage can cause intermittent failures as the product is used and aged. Short-term problems such as operating and storage temperatures, poorly regulated power, or susceptibility to electromagnetic interference (EMI) can break a device under certain conditions while it seems to work fine at other times. Where will the device be used?</p>
<p><strong><em>Appearance</em></strong></p>
<p>Some engineers may not like to consider how a device will look before it is actually working. However, design and appearance are important factors in the usability, marketability, and overall attractiveness of a device. You may have a company color scheme or user interface requirements to meet.</p>
<p><strong><em>Additional Factors</em></strong></p>
<p>Depending on the product, there can be a variety of other considerations. For medical devices, safety and regulatory compliance are significant considerations to be determined early in the project. How the user will interact with the device is also important. Additional factors such as requirements for product reliability, serviceability, assembly, and documentation may also be defined. Here’s where we might include any operational procedures like setup or shut-down requirements, calibration, or testing.</p>
<p>Photo credit: <em><a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1238327">Chris Baker</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keytechinc.com/blog/index.php/2009/starting-your-product-specification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

